Git rebase vs merge

Git rebase and merge both integrate changes from one branch into another. Where they differ is how it's done. Git rebase moves a feature branch into a master. Git merge adds a new commit, preserving the history

Git rebase vs merge

If you want to see the history completely same as it happened, you should use merge. Merge preserves history whereas rebase rewrites it.
Rebasing is better to streamline a complex history, you are able to change the commit history by interactive rebase. 
You can remove undesired commits, squash two or more commits into one or edit the commit message.
Rebase will present conflicts one commit at a time whereas merge will present them all at once.
It is better and much easier to handle the conflicts but you shouldn’t forget that
reverting a rebase is much more difficult than reverting a merge if there are many conflicts. 
You can find details of a basic rebase process from git — Basic Rebase .

Git pull vs rebase

git pull fetches the latest changes of the current branch from a remote and applies those changes to your local copy of the branch. 
Generally this is done by merging, i.e. the local changes are merged into the remote changes. So git pull is similar to git fetch & git merge.

git pull --rebase :
The local changes you made will be rebased on top of the remote changes, instead of being merged with the remote changes.

Similar codes

2 votes171 views4 answers
Converting mp3 with FFMPEG
Shell/Bash
1 vote158 views1 answer
How to access mongo shell
Shell/Bash
0 vote126 views1 answer
Git merge master terminal insert
Shell/Bash
3 votes174 views1 answer
Apollo client install in gatsby
Shell/Bash
8 votes218 views4 answers
Pem to crt
Shell/Bash
0 vote162 views1 answer
How to open a window using linux terminal
Shell/Bash
0 vote191 views1 answer
Output current max digital pin
Shell/Bash
1 vote229 views1 answer
Gitkraken
Shell/Bash
1 vote184 views1 answer
Gitaarles amsterdam
Shell/Bash
1 vote158 views1 answer
"git reset –- soft head^"
Shell/Bash