Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

2 votes167 views1 answer
Kotlin regex
Kotlin
1 vote172 views1 answer
Kotlin optional callback
Kotlin
2 votes158 views1 answer
Kotlin read all bytes from inputstream
Kotlin
0 vote172 views1 answer
Kotlin every
Kotlin
3 votes170 views2 answers
How to connect with firebase in android studio manually
Kotlin
0 vote171 views1 answer
Kotlin split by uppercase
Kotlin
1 vote161 views1 answer
Sp to px kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote197 views1 answer
Kotlin gradle resources folder
Kotlin
1 vote153 views1 answer
Getsystemservice in fragment kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote173 views1 answer
Android calendar get year
Kotlin