Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote139 views2 answers
Kotlin filter map by key
Kotlin
1 vote137 views1 answer
Object kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote130 views2 answers
Read file kotlin
Kotlin
7 votes249 views2 answers
Extension function kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote150 views1 answer
Json to kotlin data class
Kotlin
2 votes142 views1 answer
Return@foreach not working kotlin
Kotlin
3 votes136 views1 answer
Countdowntimer kotlin
Kotlin
-1 vote145 views1 answer
Andoird kotlin delay
Kotlin
0 vote144 views1 answer
Kotlin for loop with float
Kotlin
2 votes124 views1 answer
Open fragment from activity kotlin
Kotlin