Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote198 views1 answer
Kotlin map filterNot
Kotlin
2 votes183 views1 answer
Kotlin for ios
Kotlin
1 vote197 views1 answer
Kotlin collection literals
Kotlin
0 vote230 views1 answer
Play sound android studio kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote182 views1 answer
Kotlin not configured android studio
Kotlin
1 vote181 views1 answer
Length of array kotlin
Kotlin
2 votes187 views1 answer
Kotlin read all bytes from inputstream
Kotlin
0 vote191 views1 answer
Kotlin fold
Kotlin
0 vote126 views1 answer
Custom listview in android kotlin with baseadapter with clicklistener
Kotlin
1 vote197 views1 answer
Kotlin optional callback
Kotlin