Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote165 views2 answers
Get map by index kotlin
Kotlin
2 votes185 views2 answers
Kotlin java
Kotlin
3 votes167 views1 answer
Countdowntimer kotlin
Kotlin
4 votes185 views2 answers
Kotlin convert string to arraylist
Kotlin
2 votes174 views1 answer
Btn start activity kotlin
Kotlin
2 votes170 views1 answer
Kotlin set
Kotlin
0 vote184 views1 answer
Array constructor kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote166 views1 answer
Preferencemanager is deprecated
Kotlin
2 votes169 views6 answers
Hide keyboard android
Kotlin
4 votes186 views2 answers
Kotlin string to char array
Kotlin