Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote205 views1 answer
Retrofit read value from headers kotlin site:stackoverflow.com
Kotlin
2 votes200 views1 answer
Data type in kotlin
Kotlin
3 votes210 views1 answer
Toolbar in fragment android kotlin
Kotlin
7 votes346 views2 answers
User input in kotlin
Kotlin
3 votes202 views1 answer
Kotlin string to array
Kotlin
1 vote192 views1 answer
Kotlin set text from resource
Kotlin
0 vote206 views1 answer
Only allow numbers kotlin
Kotlin
1 vote213 views1 answer
Kotlin get time milis hour minutes
Kotlin
0 vote257 views2 answers
How to verify email in kotlin
Kotlin
7 votes418 views4 answers
Coroutines kotlin android dependency
Kotlin