Glide vs picasso

Glide's loading times are faster and it uses a small amount of memory 
for cache, but the library size is quite large. It, too, is easy to 
implement. Glide might be a better alternative to Picasso when memory
footprint is less of a concern or more and larger images need to be processed

Glide and picasso difference

Memory consumption: Glide occupies less memory as compared to Picasso. Reason being is Picasso loads full images doesn't matter what ImageView dimensions are mentioned, where as Glide loads image from server for the ImageView size (height/width)
Library size: Glide is heavier in terms of library size as compared to Picasso.
Number of methods: Glide is having more number of methods as compared to Picasso.
GIF Support: Picasso doesn't support GIF image loading.

Similar codes

0 vote123 views1 answer
Var and val in kotlin
Kotlin
0 vote109 views2 answers
Kotlin Null Safety
Kotlin
0 vote109 views4 answers
Kotlin queue
Kotlin
0 vote122 views1 answer
Kotlin override
Kotlin
0 vote126 views1 answer
Open fun in kotlin
Kotlin
2 votes110 views1 answer
How to write a function in kotlin
Kotlin
5 votes131 views1 answer
Random string generator kotlin
Kotlin
2 votes111 views1 answer
Cannot inline bytecode built with JVM target 1.8 into bytecode that is being built with JVM target 1.6. Please specify proper '-jvm-target' option
Kotlin
0 vote56 views0 answer
Kotlin
5 votes128 views2 answers
Android recyclerview scroll to bottom
Kotlin